An analysis of the movie twelve angry men

Their verdict is now a solid not guilty. The net result is a large blind area. His outburst has caused quite a disturbance in the room.

Each of them come from different situations with individual and unique experiences. A rational, unflappable, self-assured and analytical stock broker who is concerned only with the facts, and is appalled by the bigotry of Juror It is always easier to overcome an objection if you know what it is.

Once he did this he realized the anger and frustration with regards to his son has been misdirected toward the accused. Eventually, he finds himself the only one maintaining a vote of guilty.

Active Themes Juror Seven nervously offers gum to the men at the water cooler and makes idle chat. Juror Eight responds by asking to see the knife again—the Foreman looks at him questioningly before talking to the guard. Fonda later stated that he would never again produce a film.

Later in life, the two are not in touch with each other. The vote must be unanimous. Juror 8 argues that reasonable doubt exists, and that he therefore cannot vote "guilty", but concedes that he has merely hung the jury. He has his opinion and loves to share it. Active Themes Juror Eight finally takes his turn.

If there is any reasonable doubt they are to return a verdict of not guilty. He is the only juror to change his vote more than once during deliberations, initially voting "guilty", and changing three times. Seven is similarly unsympathetic with the kid. A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy.

Cast[ edit ] The twelve jurors are referred to — and seated — in the order below: Throughout the film it appears that he cares little about the arguments being made; his greatest concern is get to a verdict in time to make it to the evening baseball game; played by Jack Warden.

Later in life, the two are not in touch with each other.

After questioning his sanity they hastily decide to humor the juror 8 Henry Fonda by agreeing to discuss the trial for one hour. Juror Eight is the only dissenter. A complete kinescope of that performance, which had been missing for years and was feared lost, was discovered in The preliminary vote shows that many of the jurors at this point are not interested in deliberating at length.

The movie illustrates that everything is not what it appears to be. Ideas about income and the difficulties of living in poverty appear throughout the play, affecting the jury members views in general and of the case. He feels his sense of reality is in question and it threatens him.

12 Angry Men is a American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose. 12 Angry Men; Twelve Angry Men; 12 Angry Men at the TCM Movie Database; 12 Angry Men at AllMovie; 12 Angry Men at Rotten Tomatoes; Criterion Collection Essay. Analysis of The film 12 Angry Men Jason Lovett MBA Richard Devos School of Business Management Northwood University Executive Summary The Movie "Twelve Angry Men" is the ultimate example of a group of people forced to interact in order to reach a single, defined goal.

Get all the details on 12 Angry Men: Analysis. Description, analysis, and more, so you can understand the ins and outs of 12 Angry Men. 12 Angry Men Film Analysis 25 October Film Analysis The film, 12 Angry Men (), is a drama about a jury that was to decide the fate of a teenaged boy who was facing the electric chair for supposedly killing his father with a switchblade knife.

Get all the details on 12 Angry Men: Analysis. Description, analysis, and more, so you can understand the ins and outs of 12 Angry Men. 12 Angry Men Analysis 12 Angry Men is a movie, directed by Sidney Lumet, about twelve jurors who are deliberating a murder trial. An 18 year old has been accused of murdering his father and the jury has retired to determine his fate.

An analysis of the movie twelve angry men